[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Kristian Nørgaard <sslug@sslug> writes: > xemacs21 > emacs21 Jeg kan kun give Peter ret i at det er en af disse du skal vælge. Jeg bruger selv GNU Emacs. Hvis du har adgang til en newsserver der fører news:comp.emacs, så check blandt andet også den tråd der starter med <news:sslug@sslug>. Husk også at læse de andre indlæg i tråden, den starter nemlig med en hel flok misforståelser ;-) Hvis du ikke har brugt Emacs før vil jeg ikke tro at du vil opleve den helt store forskel. Der er det vist mest lidt med udseendet der er forskelligt. -- Jacob - www.bunk.cc Expect the worst, it's the least you can do.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |