[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] Forslag til PM: Må Linux-brugere lytte til digital musik ? (Was: When the music's over...)



Erik Lange wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:46:40 +0200, Niels Elgaard Larsen
> <sslug@sslug> wrote:
> 
>>Erik Lange wrote:
>>
>>> Nemlig - så nu forsøger de at køre sagen efter Infosoc, da de ikke
>>> kunne vinde efter de gamle love. Dermed er det pludseligt uhyggeligt
>>> relevant...
>>
>>Hvis man i Norge kan anke en sag og i ankesagen ændre anklageskriftet til
>>at referere til andre paragraffer, der endda blev vedtaget efter at sagen
>>blev anlagt, så har den norske sag da slet ingen relevans.
> 
> Nå... jeg mener det er rimelig uinteressant, at han blev frikendt
> efter de gamle interesser. Det interessante er, om han bliver dømt
> efter de nye, som er mage til dem vi fik indført sidste år.


Det er fri fantasi at Jon kan blive dømt efter en InfoSoc lov.
I Norge vedtager man heller ikke love med tilbagevirkende kraft.
Og man ændrer heller ikke tiltalen i appelsager.

Her er EFF siger om _appel_ sagen:
http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DeCSS_prosecutions/Johansen_DeCSS_case/20030120_eff_pr.php


"The lower court ruled unanimously that Johansen did not violate Norwegian
law," said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Executive Director Shari
Steele. "Johansen did not violate any copyrights and Norway doesn't have a
Digital Millennium Copyright Act that could prevent DVD owners from viewing
their own DVDs on their own computers as we have here in the United
States." 


> Ministeren udtalte efter frikendelsen efter de gamle paragraffer til,
> at han mente en lignende sag ville få samme udgang herhjemme.
> 
> Men han ved det ikke, for det var ikke de paragraffer sagen blev
> prøvet efter...

Og naturligvis heller ikke dem, der bliver brugt i en appelsag.

>  så vi må vente på dommen, og befinder os indtil da i
> limboland.

Jon sagen har stadig intet med InfoSoc i DK at gøre.

--
Niels


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:21 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *