[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] kæmpebøde til MS for patent krænkelse



On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:17:09 +0200, Steen Jensen <sslug@sslug>
wrote:

>Jørgen Ramskov skrev:
>
>> Steen Jensen wrote:
>> 
>>> Det kunne måske være fornuftigere at påpege, at det vil medføre store 
>>> ændringer, idet der ikke længere er mulighed for at anvende IE som en 
>>> defactostandard-browser. Pludselig vil MS formentlig have to slags 
>>> browsere.
>> 
>> 
>> Tjae...ud fra det dokument, så tror jeg faktisk det patent rammer alle 
>> browsere.
>
>Tja, og hvad så. Mit synspunkt er jo netop, at nu kan vi påpege, at der 
>sker ændring i forhold til den gældende defacto-standard, så når de nu 
>alligevel skal ændre deres hjmmeside, så koster det IKKE noget at sørge 
>for, at den overholder standarden.

Men hvad hvis _standarden_ er patenteret ?

<snip>
>> Hvis jeg husker korrekt, så har Amazon også lige fået hvad der svarer 
>> til deres "one-click" patenter i USA, godkendt i EPO, så det nu også er 
>> gældende her. Amazon har jo vundet en retsag på det patent, så jeg ser 
>> det da ikke som usandsynligt at de ikke også kunne finde på at sagsøge 
>> firmaer i EU nu...
>> 
>> 
>
>Såvidt jeg erindrer, blev det netop fastslået, at Amazon IKKE har patent 
>her i Danmark! Så det er ret meget usandsynligt, at de vil bruge penge 
>på at sagsøge et eneste firma i Danmark og størstedelen af (EU) med 
>mindre de har patent i det pågældende EU-land.

I'm really sad to say - but you're so wrong :-(

http://swpat.ffii.org/#swnamaz030818

Hilsen,
Erik L


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:21 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *