[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Hanne Munkholm wrote: > Hmmm. Så vidt jeg husker blev det oprindelig indlæg ret > hurtigt fulgt op af en kommentar om at "undskyld > forstyrrelsen på en søndag formiddag hvor den ægte > skadefryd har trange kår" fra den oprindelige > forfatter. > > Det kan godt være at du kan udlede noget du finder > interessant af indlægget selvom det havde et helt andet > formål, og det er da dejligt (for dig). Netop. > > Jeg så det oprindelige indlæg som et relativt uskyldige > og inderligt ligegyligt udsagn a la "ha ha, har I set > at MS er nede". Ligesom Peter og de fleste andre. > > Efter at have læst dit indædte forsvar af at indlægget > er relevant fordi tænk nu hvis alle begynder at bruge > ASP, kan jeg ikke lade være med at tænke på en bog af > Jørn Riel, med nogle grønlandske skrøner. [..] Men, pointen er stadig, at man i visse tilfælde kan udlede mening af det folk siger, selv om de "information from a covert channel". At nogen finder det "haha" at Microsofts website (måske) er nede, ændrer ikke ved det faktum at deres website (måske) er nede. > > Selvfølgelig har du ret i at det er synd hvis alle > begynder at bruge ASP. Men jeg mener det er at lege > lidt langt ude associationsleg med det oprindelige > indlæg.... Du udsatte, indtil Jan selv skrev det, i lige så høj grad indlægget for fortolkning. Jeg forsøgte i det mindste at få noget interessant ud af det, IMHO. Mads -- Mads Bondo Dydensborg. sslug@sslug But the Napster case is not just, or even mainly, about piracy. It is about business models. The industry wants to stick to its old one - selling expensive compact discs - and to protect it. But Napster's success shows that there is a lot of appetite for a new model. The old model is legal, but the new one is not, since the industry refuses to endorse it. Artists' interests deserve legal protection, within limits; business models do not. - The Economist, 2001.02.24
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |